Knight Center
Knight Center

JOURNALISM IN THE AMERICAS Blog

Race and media in the United States: Trayvon Martin case has journalists questioning their role in the story



Beyond public outrage and accusations of racism, the shooting of unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Florida also has prompted debate about how the news media should cover such a racially sensitive story, and where journalists should draw the line in terms of exercising their rights as citizens versus curtailing their opinions as reporters.

In a case that has garnered national attention, on Feb. 26, Martin, a Black Florida high school student, was shot to death by George Zimmerman, a self-appointed neighborhood watch captain who has yet to be charged with a crime.

Alan Jenkins of the Kansas City Star noted that the news media have "had a hand in creating the mindset that leads to tragedies like this one," as media distortions of Blacks reinforce negative stereotypes, with the potential to "increase African-American men's likelihood of being shot without justification."

Perhaps not wanting to reinforce stereotypes, most news media have published an old photo of a smiling, young Martin, sparking debate about why recent photos of the teen -- who had a tattoo and gold teeth -- were not used, according to The Cutline. The newer photo was obtained from Martin's Twitter account, along with tweets from the month before his shooting, without the family's permission, raising questions about the ethics behind unauthorized access to social media accounts, explained The Examiner.

A cartoon published in the college newspaper The Daily Texan also sparked controversy and allegations of racism for using an offensive term to refer to African Americans, and for implying that the media had turned the shooting into a bigger deal than it really was, according to KUT News radio station and the New York Daily News. The newspaper's editorial board apologized, adding that all newspaper employees will have to attend a seminar on race and the media, reported the San Antonio Express-News.

Meanwhile, ESPN reversed its original decision banning journalists from posting pictures of themselves in hoodies -- Martin was wearing a hoodie when he was killed -- to show solidarity with the teen. The network decided “to allow this particular expression of human sympathy.” Writing for the Poynter Review Project Blog, however, Kelly McBride criticized the sports reporters who changed their social media photos to show themselves wearing hoodies, telling journalists "if you want to make a difference, explain the story, don’t become part of it."

As Poynter questioned, what is the difference between ESPN reporters being allowed to wear hoodies to show solidarity with Martin, and Gannett company reporters who were disciplined for signing a petition to recall Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker? "Both instances raise the question: What rights should journalists be free to exercise?"



2 comments

 
Charlene wrote 1 year 34 weeks ago

Mass Media

The mass media has acted to perpetuate the social problems it covers. The mass media must be considered to be a large part of the problem in areas of race, class, and gender. In order to combat this situation, the mass media must formulate a new plan that makes itself more open to different perspectives and that will also challenge traditional models of race and class and gender.

 
Jeffrey Pierce wrote 2 years 2 weeks ago

Freedom involves choice

Excellent post!

As a writer, I was trained to separate and suppress my personal voice away from the voice of the characters and the narrative in a work of fiction, and I believe this discipline serves equally well in journalistic reportage. It may be hard to do, but it's necessary in order to become excellent at the craft.

As a reader, the more evidence of bias I detect in an article (or its writer), the less I trust the contents to be complete and accurate.

So to answer the question, of course journalists are free to exercise all their rights of speech, but if they expect to be trusted as reporters, they need to maintain a clear separation between their objective reporting and expression of their personal opinions. This may require choosing one and not the other in any given time and place of discourse; if you are a mass media reporter, you may have already made your choice.

Numerous other occupations, professions and human endeavors require this same kind of restraint: namely, avoiding the appearance of conflict of interest. Taking either side in a public controversy is going to have consequences for anyone who wants to serve the widest possible audience.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.


Newsletter

Subscribe to our twice weekly newsletter about journalism in the Americas.

Choose your language:


English
Español
Português


Please enter your e-mail address:


Facebook

Recent comments