Salvadoran court eliminates immunity for journalists accused of defamation
In what has been characterized as a “blow to the media,” the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador declared unconstitutional a section of the penal code that exempted media, reporters, editors and owners from legal responsibility for defamation. According to the ruling, the law violated the principle of equality, reported El Mundo and El Faro.
La Página explained that even though the Supreme Court established criminal penalties for defamation -- which until now had just been civil — the ruling maintained protection for so-called “journalistic criticism.” In other words, "unfavorable" opinions from journalists are not punishable.
In an editorial, El Faro acknowledged that the ruling protects the practice of journalism, but said there is a need for new laws guaranteeing even more the rights to information and freedom of expression. “If the ruling of the Court is not accompanied by debate in Congress to create new legislation, then we will be at the mercy of a judge deciding when it is defamation and when it is criticism, and that is also dangerous," the editorial said.
Other Related Headlines:
» Diario CoLatino (Decision is not an attack on freedom of expression)
» El Mundo (Parties do not accept Supreme Court ruling, but say they will respect it)
- El Salvador's Supreme Court to rule on legality of jail time for defamation
- El Salvador's Supreme Court rules president's attempt to limit access to public information unconstitutional
- Article 19 denounces Colombian court ruling that preserves criminal defamation
- Peruvian Supreme Court voids journalist's prison sentence for defamation
- Court in Dominican Republic declares imprisonment unconstitutional in cases of defamation against government