Society of Professional Journalists pushes U.S. newsrooms to stop using "illegal immigrant" and "illegal alien"
At its annual conference, the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) voted Tuesday, Sept. 27, to recommend that newsrooms across the United States end the use of the terms "illegal immigrant" and "illegal alien" in stories, reported MediaBistro.
The resolution approved by the 7,800-member organization says that "only the court system, not reporters and editors, can decide when a person has committed an illegal act," according to the Maynard Institute.
An opinion piece in Forbes applauded the news, saying, "Using objective language is the first step to thinking clearly about a subject, and SPJ’s resolution gives me hope that we’re moving toward a rational immigration debate."
Previously, the National Association of Hispanic Journalists voiced concern that the use of the terms "illegal immigrant" and "illegal alien" is dehumanizing, and that poor news coverage of Latinos is contributing to an anti-immigrant sentiment.
The AP Stylebook, the standard grammar and word-choice guide which many newsrooms across the country follow, recommends "illegal immigrant" as the preferred choice, but doesn't tell journalists what term to use, other than to say the term "illegals" should not be used.
The SPJ resolution comes on the heels of the Knight Center's 9th Austin Forum on Journalism in the Americas, which focused on "Media Coverage of Migration in the Americas." During the annual gathering, journalists from throughout the Western hemisphere called for more humanized, in-depth coverage of immigration that goes beyond stereotypes and cliches.
Earlier in September, Colorlines.com reported that its analysis of newspaper archives had found that "since the September 11 attacks, there has been a steady increase in language that frames unauthorized immigrants as a criminal problem. References to “illegals,” “illegal immigrants” and their rhetorical variants now dominate the speech of both major political parties, as well as news media coverage of immigration."
In other SPJ business, the organization made a controversial move in its decision not to revive its Helen Thomas Lifetime Achievement Award. In January, the organization retired the award named in honor of the longtime White House correspondent following controversial comments she made about Israel that led to her forced retirement.
Other Related Headlines:
» New America Media ("Illegal Immigrant" or "Undocumented Worker"? What Ethnic Media Says About The Implications of Language)
- Journalists issue call for more humanized, in-depth coverage of migration at 9th Austin Forum on Journalism in the Americas
- Plaza Pública: In-depth, nonprofit news site in Guatemala tackles taboo themes (Interview)
- ISOJ conference to cover main issues of digital journalism, from industry’s disruption to mobile revolution
- Ecuadoran government's offensive threatens the OAS's Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression
- 13 lessons from ISOJ to innovate journalism according to the blog #nohacefaltapapel